Angus Journal

JUL 2015

The Angus Journal® is a monthly magazine known for in-depth coverage of American Angus Association® programs and services; the Angus business; herd management; and advertising reflecting genetics and herd philosophies.

Issue link: http://angusjournal.epubxp.com/i/529629

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 67 of 132

Good Mama Cows - bred one straw at a Time! Tim & Tandy West 846 County Road 26 • Centre, AL 35960 • 256-927-2025 AI Sires: Impression, Capitalist, Comrade, Reserve, Mentor and Upshot Join the Alabama Angus Breeders contact: David Gazda (706) 296-7846 • dgazda@angus.org or Karri Mildenberger (816) 383-5289 kmildenberger@angusjournal.com LEGACY FARMS The Cornerstone Breeding Excellence February Bull Sale • April Firm Foundation Sale Philip and Jacqueline Gleason 450 Trellis Circle Springville, AL 35146 (205) 655-5350 Clinic (256) 390-4651 Jackie Cell (205) 612-2846 Philip Cell Gleason4@windstream.net Dr. Philip Gleason, Jr. Argo Animal Clinic 8916 Gadsden Hwy. Trussville, AL 35173 drgaac@aol.com Proverbs 3:5-6 LAWLER ANGUS FARM We are excited to host the following sales! Southeast Classic Bull Sale – 2nd Saturday in January 19th Southeast Angus Classic Sale – 3rd Saturday in May Held at our farm on Highway 51, 11 miles south of Opelika Rosemond L. & Tillman Dudley Bruce Randall, Manger (334) 741-7761• rldudley65@aol.com Visitors Welcome Anytime! BUILDING A TOTAL PERFORMANCE PROGRAM www.tennesseerivermusic.com Randy & Kelly Owen 553 Randy Owen Dr. NE Fort Payne, AL 35967 John & Randa Starnes (O) 256-845-3936 cattle@tennesseerivermusic.com Jason, BriAnna and Camden Upchurch 90572 Hwy 9 • Lineville, AL 36266 256-239-8540 cell upchurchangus@gmail.com www.upchurchangus.com a d C timing — cyclical market fuctuations, fxed costs (overhead), variable costs (primarily feed), and the goals of the producer — should be considered. Cow-calf producers may face obstacles to implement preconditioning management on their ranch due to lack of facilities and labor necessary to keep weaned calves on the farm, or from a reluctance to bear the health risks for postweaning calves. In some areas of the country, raised or local feedstuffs are not available at a price that allows low cost of gain. These obstacles are legitimate reasons that some producers should not precondition their calves. To overcome these obstacles, producers must be able to utilize cost-effective weaning, working and feeding facilities; obtain feed at a competitive cost; grow the calves at a high enough rate of gain to allow a low cost of gain; and sell the calves in marketing channels and to buyers that reward preconditioning. Another consideration that supports increased utilization of preconditioning by cow-calf producers is that beef production is shifting toward a consumer focus and new areas are achieving more attention, including individual animal identifcation; value-based marketing; animal health and welfare; food safety; and source, process and age verifcation. These changes in the beef industry are compatible with concepts of preconditioning management and should serve to generate further interest in preconditioning throughout the beef production chain. July 2015 n ANGUSJournal n 65 EMAIL: rlarson@vet.k-state.edu Editor's Note: Bob Larson is professor of production medicine at Kansas State University.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Angus Journal - JUL 2015
loading...
Angus Journal

Don't have an Angus Journal Subscription? Sign up now.

Not currently enrolled for the digital version? Enroll now.

Please enter your Customer Code in the username field below.

remember me